MARSH
In the latest iteration, the application of the Government Procurement Rules to public sector agencies is broadly unchanged, subject to a few nuances.
In addition, an “expectation” is a new category of Rule which indicates an expectation that agencies meet good practice standards unless circumstances mean it is not appropriate to do so. Agencies must record their decision-making processes. Procurement teams should ensure their processes are up to date to comply with this documentation requirement.
The concept of a compulsory rule (a “must” rule) and a good practice/strongly recommended rule (a “should” rule) have also been maintained in the new Rules.
Appropriate use of taxpayer-funded, public money remains at the heart of the Rules.
Where the value threshold is met, the new Rules introduce an “economic benefit test” which will replace the “broader outcomes” rules.
| Old rules | New rules | |
| New rules | The "broader outcomes" rules required agencies to consider secondary benefits that are generated from the procurement activity (which could be environmental, social, economic or cultural). | The "economic benefit test" (Rule 8) will require agencies to seek economic benefits to New Zealand. This test will be evaluated as part of the assessment of public value (with a minimum weighting of 10%). |
| Below value threshold | N/A | There is an "expectation" that contracts under the value threshold will be awarded to capable New Zealand businesses which have a capacity to deliver the contract. |
Examples of economic benefits include:
When contracting with a supplier, agencies must ensure the contract includes provisions for delivering the economic benefits. Agencies also have to conduct sufficient monitoring throughout the life of the contract to ensure suppliers’ commitments are delivered and reported on.
The new Rules introduce new requirements for setting up a supplier panel (a “secondary procurement”), including having a contract management plan and guide in place for how the panel will operate.
There is also a new transparency requirement for secondary procurements over $100,000, with agencies required to either:
We understand these changes aim to improve transparency and contract/supplier management in secondary procurements.
NZGP published a new version of the standard government model contract (GMC) templates in August 2025 to “reflect the new Rules”.
The key changes are (in our view) non-material and include:
The GMC templates continue to be suitable for low-value, low-risk routine goods and services (but excluding ICT and construction contracts, or contracts where personal information is accessed by, or collected by third-party suppliers). Updated copies are available here and should be used going forward.
Overall, we think the new Rules are positive. Of note:
Agencies should prepare for the 1 December 2025 commencement date by familiarising themselves with the new Rules (and associated guidance and template documents) and update their procurement processes to reflect these. NZGP has published guidance on transitioning to the new Rules here.
Suppliers also need to familiarise themselves with the new Rules, and in particular, should think about how they will respond to the economic benefit test as part of a procurement.
We are following how the new Rules sit alongside the government’s guidance on generative AI procurement when procuring AI tools for their organisations. Most generative AI providers and developers are based overseas, so they will need to show they can deliver an economic benefit to New Zealand.
We are also watching the developments in the centralisation of digital procurement by the Government Chief Digital Officer on behalf of most public service agencies and Crown entities, following the announcement in September 2025. Plans currently include a “NZ Government App”, which will include functionality relating to secure notifications, digital identity documents and payments for government services.
Our team has deep experience advising government agencies, and suppliers to government, on the implications of the rules and on best practice in procurement. If you’d like advice on the implication of the new Rules on your organisation, or assistance with a procurement, contact our experts Campbell Featherstone, Hayley Miller, Hayden Wilson and Peter Callus.